Snyk Vs Wiz

Introduction

Choosing the right code security tool can make or break your development and security outcomes. In this post, we compare Wiz and Snyk – two popular platforms that help secure your codebase – from the perspective of a technical leader. We’ll see how each tool fits into modern DevSecOps workflows and why the choice matters for development velocity and security coverage.

TL;DR

Wiz and Snyk both help secure code, but they focus on different layers and each has blind spots. Wiz is strongest at scanning open-source components and cloud containers, while Snyk shines in static code analysis. Both leave gaps that can slow down teams. Aikido Security brings these worlds together in one platform with fewer false positives and smoother integration – making it the better choice for modern security teams.

Overview of Wiz

Wiz is a cloud-native security platform known for its focus on cloud infrastructure. It scans your cloud environments (AWS, Azure, GCP) for misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and secrets across workloads and services. Wiz works agentlessly at scale, giving security teams a bird’s-eye view of risk in running environments. Recently, Wiz also introduced “Wiz Code” features to scan source code repositories for issues like vulnerable libraries and misconfigured IaC (Infrastructure as Code).

While Wiz excels at cloud security, it’s not primarily a code quality tool. Its roots are in identifying cloud risks – think of misconfigured servers, exposed databases, and vulnerable container images. Wiz’s strength lies in finding these problems in production environments and prioritizing them by impact (for example, flagging a critical bug that’s actually exploitable in your cloud). However, traditionally Wiz wasn’t built for deep static analysis of application code; it’s now expanding into that area via integrations.

Overview of Snyk

Snyk is a developer-first application security platform. It initially made its name by scanning open-source dependencies for known vulnerabilities (SCA), and later expanded into scanning proprietary code (SAST), containers, and IaC templates. The idea is to integrate security checks directly into development: Snyk plugs into your git repos, CI/CD pipelines, and even IDEs to catch issues early.

Snyk’s focus is on the code and components during development – essentially shifting security left so developers fix problems before deployment. It provides quick feedback when you introduce a risky library or a dangerous coding pattern. Snyk is strong at surfacing issues in code and container images before they hit production, but it doesn’t extend much into runtime cloud monitoring. In other words, Snyk secures the app layer (code, dependencies, config) but doesn’t inspect your live cloud infrastructure for threats.

Security Scanning Capabilities

Snyk covers multiple AppSec testing types: it does SAST (static code analysis for vulnerabilities in your proprietary code), SCA (open source dependency scanning), container image scanning, and IaC checks. This broad coverage means Snyk can find an insecure coding pattern in your application, a vulnerable npm library in your project, or a misconfigured Terraform script – all within one platform.

Wiz, by contrast, specializes in cloud and infrastructure scanning. It shines at CSPM (cloud security posture management) – identifying misconfigurations and risky setups in cloud services and workloads. Wiz recently added source code scanning (SCA for dependencies, IaC, secrets) via Wiz Code, but it does not have a native SAST engine for deep code analysis. In fact, Wiz relies on integrating third-party scanners (like Checkmarx) for application code results, rather than doing it all in-house.

Bottom line: Snyk is stronger in code-level scanning, whereas Wiz covers the cloud and infrastructure angle more deeply.

Integration & DevOps Workflow

For a security tool to succeed, it must slot into how your team works day-to-day. Snyk integrates tightly with developer tools – from IDE plugins to GitHub/GitLab pull request checks and CI pipeline hooks. Developers get real-time alerts as they code (for example, a PR check failing if a new vulnerability is introduced) and often one-click fixes. This developer-centric approach means Snyk can be adopted by engineering teams with minimal friction.

Wiz, on the other hand, is geared towards cloud and security engineers. It connects to your cloud accounts (using read-only roles or APIs) and continuously monitors resources. Integration into the developer’s daily workflow is limited – Wiz has minimal IDE support (only one IDE officially) and it often pushes you to its own dashboard for details. Developers might have to log into the Wiz console to investigate issues, which can slow down remediation.

In short, Snyk fits naturally into DevOps pipelines, whereas Wiz lives in the cloud console, closer to SecOps. This difference impacts adoption: developers tend to ignore tools that aren’t seamlessly integrated into their existing workflow.

Accuracy and False Positives

One major complaint about security scanners is noise. False positives – issues flagged that turn out not to be real problems – create alert fatigue. Snyk, with its developer-first ethos, has invested in reducing noise (for example, using its DeepCode AI to improve static analysis). However, users still report that Snyk can overwhelm teams with low-priority findings or false alarms, especially in certain languages. Tuning is often needed to filter out “noise” so developers aren’t chasing ghosts.

Wiz, by focusing on cloud context, tends to prioritize findings based on real risk. It correlates vulnerabilities with whether the affected resource is actually exposed or critical, which can mean fewer trivial alerts – Wiz highlights the issues that truly matter (e.g. an exploitable weakness on an internet-facing server). That said, Wiz’s new code scanning capabilities haven’t been battle-tested for noise, and pulling in results from external SAST tools could introduce some duplication or false positives if not managed well.

In general, Wiz may generate fewer false positives on cloud configuration issues, while Snyk may flag more potential issues in code that require triage. Both tools require tuning, but many teams find Wiz’s risk-based filtering helps cut down the noise.

Coverage and Scope

In terms of technology coverage, Snyk supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks (for SAST and SCA) – including Java, JavaScript/Node.js, Python, .NET, Ruby, Go, and more. It also supports container registries and IaC formats (like Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests). What Snyk doesn’t cover is your live cloud environment or network – that’s outside its scope.

Wiz, on the other hand, covers cloud infrastructure broadly: it can scan virtual machines, Kubernetes clusters, serverless functions, databases, and more across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Wiz’s new repo scanning extends its reach to code and IaC in version control, but for deep code analysis you’d integrate a separate tool. If your stack is heavily cloud-centric (microservices, multi-cloud deployments), Wiz ensures you have visibility into that layer. Conversely, if you need to thoroughly check code and dependencies pre-deployment, Snyk has the edge there.

It’s worth noting that neither tool alone covers everything end-to-end. For example, Wiz doesn’t do dynamic application testing (DAST) and Snyk’s cloud posture coverage is limited. Many organizations end up using these tools side by side – or seeking a single solution like Aikido that bridges both areas.

Developer Experience

From a usability standpoint, Snyk is built for developers to use directly. Its UI and integrations present findings in a dev-friendly way – for example, showing the exact line of code or dependency that introduced a vulnerability, with clear guidance to fix it. Snyk can even open automatic fix pull requests. As the Snyk product suite grew, however, some users feel it became clunky: multiple modules (Snyk Code, Snyk Open Source, etc.) with overlapping features, and some capabilities only available on higher-tier plans. This lack of unity can hurt the developer experience if teams have to juggle different interfaces or don’t have access to all features.

Wiz’s platform is geared toward central security teams, offering a unified cloud security dashboard with graph-based visualization of assets and issues. For a developer who just wants to fix a bug in code, the Wiz console can feel overwhelming or not directly relevant – some users describe Wiz’s interface as confusing and not intuitive. In general, developers find Snyk more approachable and easy to navigate, whereas Wiz is typically operated by SecOps or cloud teams who then communicate findings to developers as needed.

Pricing and Maintenance

Pricing and deployment model can be a deciding factor. Snyk is a SaaS offering with per-developer licensing. It has a free tier for open-source projects, but as you scale up you’ll likely need paid plans – and costs can increase significantly if you add on modules for containers, licenses, etc. For many enterprise features (advanced reporting, on-prem scanning, custom roles), Snyk requires the higher-tier plans. On the plus side, being cloud-based means setup is straightforward and there’s no infrastructure to maintain (aside from optional broker services for code privacy).

Wiz, by contrast, targets enterprises and is usually priced based on the size of your cloud environment (e.g. number of cloud assets or workloads). There’s no free tier; you go through sales for a custom quote. Wiz’s rich feature set and agentless scanning come at a premium cost – it’s an investment that smaller companies might find hard to justify.

The platform is delivered as a service (with an optional sensor for certain data), so operational maintenance is light, but you will invest time in onboarding your cloud accounts and tuning policies.

In short, Snyk might seem cheaper initially but gets pricey at scale, while Wiz is a heavyweight investment from the get-go.

Aikido offers a simpler, more transparent pricing model – flat and predictable – and is significantly more affordable at scale than either Snyk or Wiz.

Pros and Cons of Each Tool

Wiz Pros

• Comprehensive cloud security: Wiz gives broad visibility into cloud infrastructure – scanning VMs, containers, network configurations, and more across AWS, Azure, and GCP.
• Agentless deployment: It connects via cloud APIs, so you don’t need to install agents everywhere to start seeing results.
• Risk-based prioritization: Wiz highlights the issues that matter most (e.g. truly exploitable risks), helping reduce noise by focusing on impactful vulnerabilities.
• Multi-cloud support: It’s built for complex environments and supports all major cloud providers.

Wiz Cons

• Limited application code scanning: Wiz lacks native SAST/DAST capabilities, so it may miss vulnerabilities buried in proprietary code.
• Not developer-centric: The platform is designed for security teams. It doesn’t integrate deeply into developer workflows (IDEs, PR checks), which can lead to developers overlooking its findings until late in the cycle.
• High cost for smaller teams: Wiz’s enterprise-grade platform and pricing can be overkill for small companies or projects.
• Steep learning curve: Some users find Wiz’s UI and query interface non-intuitive without training.

Snyk Pros

• Developer-friendly integration: Snyk embeds into IDEs, git repos, and CI pipelines, giving immediate feedback and one-click fixes within the tools developers use.
• Strong open-source & container coverage: Snyk’s vulnerability database for open source is extensive, and its container image scanning helps catch issues in your supply chain early.
• Quick onboarding: It’s easy to get started; teams see value quickly thanks to an intuitive interface and clear guidance.
• Continuous improvement: Snyk scans in real time as code changes, preventing new vulnerabilities from creeping in.

Snyk Cons

• Cloud blind spots: Snyk doesn’t monitor live cloud infrastructure, so it can’t catch misconfigurations like an open S3 bucket – you’ll need a separate cloud security tool for that.
• Noisy findings at times: Snyk can overwhelm developers with a flood of issues, including false positives or low-severity alerts that don’t all warrant attention.
• Module sprawl and cost: Snyk’s many modules aren’t fully unified, and achieving full coverage requires enterprise add-ons – which can get expensive.

Aikido Security: The Better Alternative

Aikido Security offers a unified platform that covers code and cloud security together, without the bloat or bullshit. It combines Snyk’s developer-first scanning (SAST, SCA, IaC, containers) with Wiz’s cloud context, minus the false-positive fatigue. Fewer alerts, smarter prioritization, and seamless DevOps integration means your developers stay productive. With flat pricing and a no-nonsense interface, Aikido eliminates the pain points of Wiz and Snyk – making it a superior choice for technical leaders who just want security that works.

Start a free Trial or request a demo to explore the full solution.